S.J. Edney solicitors were established in 1996 and are a niche Clinical
Negligence and Personal Injury Practice. Seamus Edney and Denise Broomfield
are both members of the Association for Victims of Medical Accidents
Referral Panel and the Law Society's Clinical Negligence Panel. The
firm holds a Legal Aid Franchise in Clinical Negligence
As a firm we are
committed to acting for victims of accidents and between us we have
twenty five years experience of Clinical Negligence work.

Chief
Medical Officers Report - "Making Amends" -
Proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS
An overhaul of the
way that compensation is paid for clinical negligence in the NHS was
proposed by the Chief Medical Officer at a Press Briefing on the 30
June 2003 in an attempt to speed up claims and to cut costs.
Professor Sir Liam
Donaldson published a serious of recommendations to reform the present
system which threatens to become an ever increasing burden to the National
Health Service.
He wants to reduce
the legal costs, making it easier for patients to receive an apology
without going to Court and ensure that all mistakes are investigated
so that lessons can be learnt across the NHS.
Among his concerns
are that the compensation system as it stands is to confrontational,
too slow and fails to satisfy patients while damaging the Health Service.
Negligence claims cost the NHS £477m last year compared to £6.3m
in 1975.
One of the main
recommendations is for the creation of an NHS Redress Scheme that would
appoint a panel to investigate each allegation of negligence. The investigators
would compile a report, including an assessment of whether an apology
and compensation were required and the patient would be informed of
the results.
Patients would be
given the option of going through the Redress Scheme and could be awarded
up to £30,000.00 in compensation. Their right of resorting to
legal action would be removed once compensation was accepted.
For children suffering
brain damage during birth, the scheme would offer families no fault
compensation. They would receive maximum payments of £100,000.00
a year for life together with additional lump sums for special purchases.
Doctors would also
be under a "Duty of Candour" to make it compulsory for them
to report every mistake and "near miss". In return they would
be given exemption from disciplinary hearings for negligence except
where a criminal offence had been committed or it would be unsafe to
let them continue to practice.
The paper also suggested
that documents gathered to investigate adverse events should not be
subject to disclosure in Court and also the Legal Services Commission
should look at controlling Claimant's costs in publicly funded cases.
The main
proposals are as follows:-
- Doctors
obliged to report mistakes.
- Teams
of investigators to assess all claims and patients right to take legal
action removed once compensated.
- £30,000.00
maximum compensation in most cases.
- Where
babies are severely brain damaged at birth, families to be offered
no fault compensation and regular payments of £100,000.00 a year for
life to replace large lump sums.
- More
emphasis on mediation before legal proceedings start.
- Special
training for Judges in clinical negligence cases.
- Awards
based on costs of NHS rather than private care.
On the whole, clinical
negligence lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the consultation
paper but it is vital that patients are permitted to get legal advice
on any offer made under the Redress Scheme to ensure they receive adequate
compensation. It is also imperative that the Panel of investigators
are not only independent of the Hospital Trust which is the subject
matter of the complaint but they remember that the interests of patients
are paramount.
NEWS
IN BRIEF
| NHS
Complaints
A record number of complaints about the NHS were made last year.
Anne Abraham, the Health Service Ombudsman, received 3,994 complaints
in the twelve months up to April 2003. Many complainants were
dissatisfied with the funding of long term care. |
MRSA Up
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus - the so-called "superbug"
- was reported as on the increase in the NHS hospitals with 11,000
patients infected in the period between April 2001 and September
2002 |
| Soldiers
barred from suing
It was reported that British soldiers and their dependants who
have suffered serious injuries through negligence by German hospitals
caring for them under contracts with the Ministry of Defence (MoD)
had been barred, by a High Court test case, from suing the ministry.
In the case the parents of a five-year-old boy left with severe
brain damage after his birth in a German hospital were told that
the MoD could not be held liable. The ruling would appear to raise
issues on the rights of Britons sent to other EU countries by
the NHS trusts for operations to sue the NHS if their treatment
goes wrong.
|